Connect with us


Democratic lawmaker says DOJ can ‘compel’ Alito and Thomas to recuse themselves on Supreme Court cases



In a recent opinion piece in the New York Times, Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin proposed that Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito should be forced to recuse themselves from cases related to the January 6 Capitol riots. Raskin argued that Thomas and Alito, part of the conservative wing of the Court, may not be able to objectively rule on matters surrounding the events of January 6th due to their political bias. Raskin suggested that the Department of Justice, under U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland, could petition the other justices on the Court to demand recusal, citing existing federal statutes and the U.S. Constitution.

Raskin emphasized that the recusal of Thomas and Alito is imperative not only from a legal standpoint but also from a moral perspective. He pointed out that the recusal statute is not just a suggestion but a congressional command that should be binding on the justices. The Congressman argued that Chief Justice John Roberts’ comparison of judges to umpires falls short in cases of potential bias, likening the situation to having an umpire officiate a game where one team’s pennant is flying in the umpire’s yard.

Raskin urged Chief Justice Roberts to adhere to the objective framework provided by the Constitution and Congress’s recusal statute, emphasizing the importance of defending the reputation and integrity of the Supreme Court as an institution. He called for seven members of the Court to take action in addressing potential judicial bias in cases related to the January 6 riots involving former President Trump.

The demand for Thomas and Alito to recuse themselves from cases involving Trump stems from their perceived connections to the events of January 6. Alito has recently faced criticism due to a dispute with liberal neighbors and flags displayed by his wife, including an upside-down American flag. Democrats and media outlets have raised concerns about Thomas and Alito’s impartiality, linking them to Trump and the Capitol protests.

Raskin had previously called for Justice Thomas to recuse himself based on his wife’s support for Trump’s election fraud claims. The Congressman contended that justices with personal ties to the events leading up to January 6 should not participate in related cases. Despite the calls for recusal, the focus remains on whether Thomas and Alito will comply with demands for their removal from cases involving Trump and the Capitol riots.

In conclusion, the debate over potential recusal of Justices Thomas and Alito raises questions about impartiality, judicial ethics, and the integrity of the Supreme Court. As the arguments intensify, it remains to be seen how the Court will navigate these challenges and uphold its role as an impartial arbiter of justice. The issue of recusal in high-profile cases underscores the complexities of the legal system and the importance of maintaining public trust in the judiciary.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *