Finance
Blame The Venture Capitalists for the Collapse Of SVB?
Published
1 year agoon
By
James White
On Thursday, March 16, 2023, The New York Times
NYT
“There’s plenty to say about how the bank brought this about — making risky investments, issuing communications that did more to alarm than explain. But as I hit refresh on my account balance Monday morning, I was thinking of the high-prestige venture capitalists who herded start-ups like mine to S.V.B. They’re the reason the bank was so overloaded with risky clients, and they’re also the ones who panicked at the first rumors of trouble — and advised their portfolio companies to flee, initiating the bank run that brought the whole thing tumbling down.”
From an Estate Planning perspective, the issue is not so much what the venture capitalists did, as much as how they came to the decision they did to advise their portfolio companies to withdraw funds from the bank. This is most likely because most venture capitalists who are controlling the funds are, at there core, entrepreneurs and use an action-based decision-making process
Entrepreneurs often find making decisions difficult. They make impulsive, sub-optimal decisions, often choosing options which bring a prompt but smaller reward, instead of making a choice that yields a greater reward later down the line. This difficulty in decision making extends into planning, organization, self-regulation and prioritizing – the key factors needed to decide on the course of action. Estate Planners who have clients who have experienced the consequences of impulsive decision-making know that, in making the estate plan, the clients often end up with “analysis paralysis.” This is avoiding deciding on a long-term strategy because the client is too worried about making similar wrong decisions as they experienced in the past, avoiding a decision until another person makes the decision for you.
I want to differentiate between risky and sub-optimal decision-making. Sub-optimal decision making is limited to taking the riskier option. Entrepreneurs are as risk adverse (if not more so) than most people, but they are better at making snap decisions in the heat of the moment. What they often lack is the discipline to stop and use a more managerial, prediction-based decision process, when the situation is more predictable even when the situation overall is not. This requires knowing how to be “bilingual” in both processes.
Here is an outline the action-based decision process:
- Determine what is it that you want
- Determine what are you willing and able to put at risk
- Act quickly and quietly
- With the resources and information at hand
- Bring along those people you know; and,
- With the least amount of risk possible.
- Determine if the results are what you want
- If yes, then repeat
- If no, then review what you want.
Here is a prediction-based decision process:
- What is it that you need to achieve your goal?
- What are your objectives that move you towards you goal?
- Which objective are you most likely to miss achieving?
- Consider alternative strategies that achieve your lagging objective and ask for each strategy:
- Is the strategy sufficient to achieve your objective?
- Is the strategy necessary to achieve your objective?
- Is the strategy even possible under the current circumstances?
- Is there an action plan for implementing the strategy?
- Determine the risks and trade-offs your selected strategy entails.
- Select and implement an action plan based on your selected strategy.
Here is how you put them together:
- Determine both what you want and what you need.
- Recognize where the results of your actions are predictable or unpredictable.
- For those situations where the results are unpredictable, use the action-based decision process.
- For those situations where the results are predictable, use the prediction-based decision process.
- Combine the results of the action-based planning and the action plan of the prediction-based planning.
How could the run on the Silicon Valley Bank have been different if the venture capitalists came to a different decision? Perhaps history has a lesson in the combined action-and-prediction-based decision process. In 1907 there was a run on banks that threatened to collapse the US financial system. J.P. Morgan and a group of other wealthy individuals formed a committee and essentially stopped the run, backing certain banks critical to the financial sector. Indeed, JP Morgan CEO Jamie Diamond is putting together a group of banks to do exactly the same thing his firm’s founder did in 1907 Although many found fault with the resulting consolidation, the fact remains that if they allowed the withdrawal of funds from the banks to continue, there would be a collapse, but if they backed the threated banks, it would prevent financial collapse. The outcome in either case was predictable.
Railing against the venture capitalist in hindsight is satisfying, but to avoid this situation in the future, there needs to be a better decision-making process.
Source: Forbes
The GMO tooth microbe that is supposed to prevent cavities
Two Hunters Died of Rare Prion Disease. Doctors Suspect a First-of-Its Kind Deer Transmission
THE CHIC LIST: Why I don’t get the new rugby shirt trend – or those who wear gym gear all day but never go to the gym
Why Meghan Markle’s Big Product Reveal Has Been Dubbed ‘The Twilight Zone’
‘Late Night With the Devil’ Team Shares a Behind-the-Scenes Look at Making a Haunted ’70s Set on a Low Budget
Bovine Colostrum Supplements Are Everywhere—But Are the Health Benefits Legit?
You’ll Now Have to Pay Extra for an Actual Color on Your 2024 Mustang
Discover Ubud With Hoshinoya Bali
Improved search drives OTA investment in 2024, finds Amadeus
Aston Martin Reverses Course, Will Sell Combustion Cars Into the 2030s
Why Meghan Markle’s Big Product Reveal Has Been Dubbed ‘The Twilight Zone’
Can Modi honestly run on his economic record? – Asia Times
5 keys for the Bruins if they want to beat Maple Leafs in first round
You Can Clamp Your Phone Into Razer’s Fancy New Game Controller
Taylor Swift’s New Song References Viral Video of Travis Kelce Choosing to ‘Marry’ Katy Perry
Trending
-
Tech5 hours ago
Philosopher Daniel Dennett dead at 82
-
News5 hours ago
VW workers in Tennessee vote to join UAW in historic win for Detroit union
-
Tech5 hours ago
Amazon surprises 13 Seattle-area students with ‘Future Engineer’ college scholarships
-
Sport5 hours ago
Hamilton suffers shock early elimination in qualifying for Chinese GP
-
News4 hours ago
Democratic U.S. Senate hopefuls fight to take on Larry Hogan (R)
-
Auto4 hours ago
Tesla Delivered More Cybertrucks in Four Months Than Hummer EVs Sold Last Year
-
Food5 hours ago
This Easy Addition to Your Egg Muffins Will Double Your Protein at Breakfast
-
Wellness5 hours ago
What My First Time Having Sex After Giving Birth Felt Like