Connect with us


Supreme Court strikes down Colorado ruling to remove Trump from 2024 ballot: Live



Related video: Crowd stunned into silence as Trump appears confused during speech

Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump has been handed a legal victory as justices at the US Supreme Court will let him appear on this year’s ballot papers as he closes in on his party’s nomination.

Mr Trump challenged the ground-breaking decision by the Colorado Supreme Court, which found in December that he should be ineligible to run for the White House again or take part in the state’s primary – one of 16 taking place tomorrow on Super Tuesday – citing an anti-insurrectionist clause housed within the 14th Amendment to the Constitution.

Maine and Illinois followed Colorado’s example and America’s highest court heard oral arguments on the matter on 8 February, with justices strongly signalling their support for Mr Trump’s arguments. In the end, it was a unanimous decision on the part of the justices.

On Truth Social, Mr Trump celebrated a “BIG WIN FOR AMERICA!!!”

The former president picked up three further primary wins over the weekend but lost the DC contest to rival Nikki Haley.


Meanwhile, former Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg is expected to plead guilty to perjury.


Watch: Trump claims Supreme Court decision will bring country together

Oliver O’Connell4 March 2024 17:43


ICYMI: Murkowski endorses Haley

One of the seven Republican senators who voted to convict Donald Trump for inciting a riot at the US Capitol on January 6 endorsed Nikki Haley’s bid for president.

Lisa Murkowski, the senior senator from Alaska, announced her support for the former governor of South Carolina and US ambassador to the United Nations.

Oliver O’Connell4 March 2024 17:30


Oliver O’Connell4 March 2024 17:18


Colorado Secretary of State ‘disappointed’ by SCOTUS ruling

Oliver O’Connell4 March 2024 17:14


Trump crowd goes silent as he confuses Biden and Obama… again

“Shortly after we win the presidency, I will have the horrible war between Russia and Ukraine settled,” Mr Trump said on Saturday.

“I know them both very well and we will restore peace through strength. Get that war settled. It’s a bad war. And Putin has so little respect for Obama that he’s starting to throw around the nuclear word,” Mr Trump added, seemingly in the false belief that Mr Biden’s former boss remains in charge.

There were plenty of moments during Mr Trump’s campaign events in Greensboro, North Carolina and later in Richmond when he appeared to struggle to deliver his speech or seemed to be confused.


Oliver O’Connell4 March 2024 16:47


Weisselberg to spend five months in jail after pleading guilty to perjury

Weisselberg, 76, arrived at the office of Manhattan district attorney Alvin Bragg early on Monday morning, CNN reported, after which he duly surrendered and appeared at Manhattan Criminal Court for processing wearing a Covid mask and handcuffs.

The defendant was then charged with five counts of perjury in the first degree, with the judge accepting that the plea deal he had agreed with Manhattan prosecutors, which saw him plead guilty to two of those five counts.

He was subsequently sentenced to five months in jail.

Joe Sommerlad has the story:


Ex-Trump Organization CFO pleads guilty to perjury

Allen Weisselberg arrived at office of Manhattan district attorney Alvin Bragg early on Monday morning and duly appeared in court for processing, where he was charged with five counts of perjury in the first degree

Oliver O’Connell4 March 2024 16:20


Trump celebrates ‘big win’ after Supreme Court hands him victory

Oliver O’Connell4 March 2024 16:00


Trump legal team hails victory for integrity of electoral system

“Today’s unanimous Supreme Court decision underscores the bedrock principles of our democracy and the rule of law,” said Harmeet K Dhillon, founder and managing partner of the Dhillon Law Group.

“This victory is not just for President Trump but for the integrity of our electoral system and the rights of voters across the country. The attempt to use the 14th Amendment in this manner was a dangerous overreach that, if left unchallenged, could have set a perilous precedent for future elections. We are proud to have defended the constitutional rights at stake and grateful for the Supreme Court’s unequivocal affirmation of these fundamental principles.”

Oliver O’Connell4 March 2024 15:44


CREW responds to Supreme Court decision: ‘This was in no way a win for Trump’

Noah Bookbinder, president of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, the group that led the lawsuit against the former president in Colorado, released the following statement after the Supreme Court handed down its ruling:

While the Supreme Court allowed Donald Trump back on the ballot on technical legal grounds, this was in no way a win for Trump. The Supreme Court had the opportunity in this case to exonerate Trump, and they chose not to do so. Every court–or decision-making body–that has substantively examined the issue has determined that January 6th was an insurrection and that Donald Trump incited it. That remains true today. The Supreme Court removed an enforcement mechanism, and in letting Trump back on the ballot, they failed to meet the moment. But it is now clear that Trump led the January 6th insurrection, and it will be up to the American people to ensure accountability.


Oliver O’Connell4 March 2024 15:42


Supreme Court did not clear Trump of insurrection as he had asked

Supreme Court lawyer Neal Katyal writes:

It’s a win for Trump. At the same time, remember that the Supreme Court’s decision today did not do what Donald Trump had asked: clear him of insurrection. The Colorado court found that he so was, and Trump had an entire section of his SCOTUS brief arguing he was peaceful on 1/6. The Court didn’t do what he asked; it did not clear him. And the act’s decision leaves space for his criminal trial about Jan 6 to proceed, should the Court dispose of the other Trump immunity case quickly in the Spring (as it can and must). The Court took 25 days to render this decision. Anything longer in the immunity case would be deeply inconsistent with what it did here.

Oliver O’Connell4 March 2024 15:38

Source: Independent


Follow us on Google News to get the latest Updates