Connect with us


Supreme Court to review appeal of gun charges for member of Genovese crime family



The Supreme Court has agreed to hear the appeal of Salvatore Delligatti, a Genovese crime family associate who is challenging a 2018 conviction on a gun charge that added five years to his prison sentence. Delligatti was convicted of attempted murder for hiring members of the Crips gang to kill a local “bully.” Despite the police intercepting the gang members before they could carry out the killing, Delligatti was convicted of several crimes and sentenced to 25 years in prison, including five years for the gun charge. He argues that the underlying crime in his case does not qualify as a “crime of violence.”

The issue at hand revolves around a federal law that prohibits individuals from possessing a gun as part of a “crime of violence.” Delligatti, also known as “Fat Sal,” asserts that the crime he committed does not meet the criteria for a crime of violence. Federal appeals courts have been divided on how to interpret and apply this charge in similar circumstances. Despite the Justice Department opposing Delligatti’s argument, they agree that the Supreme Court should provide clarity for lower courts by taking up his appeal.

In recent years, the Supreme Court has restricted the circumstances in which prosecutors can seek enhanced prison sentences for crimes of violence. Delligatti’s appeal heavily relies on a previous Supreme Court decision where a 7-2 majority ruled in favor of a defendant convicted of a gun charge in an attempted robbery. However, the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals upheld Delligatti’s conviction, leading to the escalation of this case to the Supreme Court.

This case not only brings up questions about the application of federal laws regarding crimes of violence but also showcases the complex interactions between organized crime, street gangs, and law enforcement. The involvement of the Crips gang in this case highlights the dangers and consequences of individuals associating with criminal organizations. Additionally, it sheds light on the challenges faced by law enforcement agencies in intercepting and preventing crimes orchestrated by individuals with ties to organized crime families.

The Supreme Court’s decision to hear Delligatti’s appeal signifies the importance of clarifying the interpretation and application of federal laws related to crimes of violence involving firearms. By addressing the conflicting rulings of lower courts, the Supreme Court aims to provide consistency and guidance in future cases involving similar circumstances. This case also serves as a reminder of the severity of crimes committed with the use of firearms, and the need for stricter regulations and enforcement measures to prevent such incidents from occurring.

As Salvatore Delligatti continues to challenge his conviction and the legality of the gun charge that added years to his prison sentence, the Supreme Court’s upcoming decision will have far-reaching implications for future cases involving crimes of violence and firearms. The resolution of this case will not only impact Delligatti’s fate but also shape the legal landscape surrounding the prosecution and sentencing of individuals involved in criminal activities with ties to organized crime groups. It remains to be seen how the Supreme Court will rule on this complex and contentious issue, and what precedents will be set for similar cases in the future.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *