Connect with us

News

Suspect in Deadly, Unprovoked Shooting of Q Train Rider Pleads Not Guilty

Published

on

The man charged with shooting and killing a passenger on a New York City subway train pleaded not guilty Wednesday to a murder charge as his lawyer suggested someone else might be to blame.

Andrew Abdullah, 25, his wrists handcuffed behind him, softly spoke the two-word plea to second-degree murder and two gun charges after he was brought to court in an orange prison uniform to respond to an indictment announced by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg.

Defense lawyer Kristin Bruan told a state judge that a person fitting the description of the shooter turned in a gun after the shooting and five individuals could not identify Abdullah in a lineup. Yet, she said, she’d not been given “a shred” of evidence by prosecutors.

Outside court, Bruan told reporters those facts cast doubt on the strength of the government’s case. She said a bearded homeless man who matched the description of Abdullah turned in a gun to police. She said she witnessed five people failing to identify her client in a lineup even though they were in the train car during the shooting.

In a release, Bragg said passenger Daniel Enriquez’s “vibrant life was brutally cut short in a flash of violence that shocked our city.” Enriquez was shot on his way to Sunday brunch in Manhattan.

Advertisement

Bragg said he wanted to assure Enriquez’s loved ones and all New Yorkers that investigators “will stop at nothing to ensure accountability for this terrible crime, and to make sure our subways are safe for all.”

The man suspected of opening fire on a subway rider at random, killing him as the train moved over the Manhattan Bridge in what officials describe as a harrowing, unprovoked act of violence is in custody.

Prosecutors said the May 22 shooting occurred shortly before noon in a Q train traveling between Brooklyn and lower Manhattan. They said Abdullah, a loaded pistol in his pocket, paced back and forth near the center of the train car before drawing his gun and firing a single shot at his 48-year-old victim.

Prosecutors previously said the other passengers scattered to the sides of the subway car, “praying for the life of their fellow passenger and hoping they would not be the next victim.”

Abdullah told passengers scurrying away but trapped with him to put away their cell phones because they’d all be getting off at the next stop before he fled at Manhattan’s Canal Street station, leaving passengers, transit workers and first responders to treat Enriquez, who died from blood loss at a hospital, they said. Abdullah was arrested two days later.

The gunman wore a hooded sweatshirt and a mask that concealed his face, but police said they used security cameras to track the killer after he fled the station, including footage that showed him shedding the clothing that initially hid his identity.

Prosecutors said Abdullah handed his gun to a homeless man on the subway stairs. The gun was later recovered by police.

Advertisement

Authorities have outlined other clues they were said to have collected. Abdullah was stopped by police as he left the area around the station and showed his identification, but was allowed to leave because he wasn’t then wearing the hooded sweatshirt witnesses had described, officials have said.

Family and friends said goodbye to the innocent man who was shot and killed on a Q train in Manhattan. Melissa Colorado reports.

Outside court, Bruan said it was unfortunate that the public assumes guilt because the police say they got the right guy. She complained that no evidence has been turned over, saying it was unusual in such a high-profile case.

“So it’s curious to me that we have five people who can’t identify him despite being on the train and the district attorney has given me not one shred of evidence. Not a video. Not a police report. Not a piece of paper. Nothing,” Bruan said.

She described her client as a “soft-spoken man” who has the support of his family and and a “very strong support system in the community.” Bruan said her client has been “cooperating fully” and had been in “constant communication” with authorities as soon as he learned he was being sought.

The lawyer said the “hardest part, professionally, is explaining to his family what’s happening to their 25-year-old son who obviously is in need of medical and psychiatric attention, and it’s not being fulfilled.”

Advertisement

Source: NBC New York

Follow us on Google News to get the latest Updates

Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending